Phronesis
No. 014Concept1986Economics ·Cuisine & Food ·Business

The Big Mac index

A 1986 joke in The Economist became one of the most cited ways to compare currencies, using the price of a hamburger.

2 min read

Purchasing power parity is the idea that, in the long run, exchange rates should adjust so that the same basket of goods costs the same everywhere. Measuring a real basket across countries is hard. In 1986, The Economist journalist Pam Woodall suggested a basket of exactly one item: a Big Mac.

How to read it

If a Big Mac costs $5.50 in the US and the equivalent of $3.50 in another country, the burger suggests that country’s currency is undervalued against the dollar by about a third. If it costs $7, the currency looks overvalued.

Why it’s imperfect, and still useful

  • A burger includes local costs such as rent and wages, which are naturally cheaper in poorer countries. The Economist now publishes a GDP-adjusted version.
  • Taxes, competition and McDonald’s pricing strategy vary by country.
  • In some places a Big Mac is a cheap meal; in others it is a treat.

The index lasts because it is concrete. Most people will never read a purchasing-power paper, but anyone can compare burger prices on holiday. Explaining an abstract idea through a familiar object is a good way to make it stick.

Bring it up

“Economists actually use the price of a Big Mac to judge whether currencies are overvalued.”

Follow the thread

You might also find interesting