Phronesis

Why your parents’ clothes look ridiculous, and your grandparents’ look charming

In 1937 a museum curator mapped how we feel about a style over time: “indecent” ten years early, “hideous” ten years late, “charming” after seventy.

2 min read

James Laver was a curator of costume at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. In Taste and Fashion (1937) he compressed the life of a style into one timeline:

When How the style looks
10 years before its time Indecent
5 years before Shameless
1 year before Daring
Current Smart
1 year after Dowdy
10 years after Hideous
20 years after Ridiculous
30 years after Amusing
50 years after Quaint
70 years after Charming
100 years after Romantic
150 years after Beautiful

Why it rings true

The worst moment for a style is 10–20 years after it peaks, when it’s associated with people just older than you: your parents, your older siblings, your own embarrassing photos. Once that generation has moved on, the style loses its associations and can become amusing, then retro, then something to revive.

That’s why fashion keeps “rediscovering” decades about 20–30 years back: the 1970s in the 1990s, the 1990s in the 2010s, and the 2000s (“Y2K”) in the 2020s.

Take it lightly

Laver never offered it as a scientific law, and fashion historians have criticised his theories as oversimplified. The exact numbers don’t hold, and today’s cycles are much faster. But the shape of the curve, with repulsion first and nostalgia later, is a useful mental model for clothes, music, furniture, fonts and slang.

Bring it up

“There’s a 1937 rule that predicts clothes look hideous ten years after they’re fashionable, and charming seventy years later.”

Follow the thread

You might also find interesting